About 57 Years v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case at a glance
- Bench
- NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as having become
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 370 of 2023 • Ashok Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Shri Shiv Kumar Agrawal Aged About 57 Years R/o Village Raweli, Radha Krishna Chowk, Ward No. 4, Thana Abhanpur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner(s) versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Labour, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (C.G.)
Registrar General Of High Court Of Chhattisgarh Bodri, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)
President State Industrial Court Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
State Industrial Court Chhattisgarh Through Registrar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
Shri Shiv Kumar Tripathi Presently Working As Member Judge Of Industrial Court, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravi Kumar Bhagat, Advocate For State : Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 2 to 4 : Mr. Deepak Diwakar, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Anurag Dayal Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent No. 5 : Mr. Krishnakant Prajapati, Advocate on behalf of Mr. D.N. Prajapati, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV 18:10:02 +0530 2
04.04.2025
1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 03.10.2019 (Annexure - P/1) passed by the respondent No. 2 by which the respondent No. 5 has been appointed as Member Judge of Industrial Court Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.).
2. The instant writ petition become infructuous by efflux of time as the respondent No. 5 against whom the petitioner has filed this writ petition is retired from services.
Operative part
3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as having become
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.