Bagbahara, P.S v. Officer-in-Charge, Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited
Case at a glance
- Bench
- RAKESH MOHAN PANDEY
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed on this count alone
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the case. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed on this count alone. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
Judgment
Mr. Atul Kesharwani, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
05.07.2023
The petitioner has filed the instant petition seeking following relief(s):- “10.1 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records concerning the petitioner case for its kind perusal.
10.2 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ to quash the impugned order dated 18/02/2014 (Annexure P-1) passed by the learned Court of District judge in Arbitration Case No. 06-A/2012 and declare the same as void and inoperative.
10.3 The Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ to the court below and direct to decide the application under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as soon as possible.
10.4 Any other relief/relief's which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case with cost of the petition may also be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.”
The order passed by the District Judge, Raipur in Arbitration Case No. 06- A/2012 is under challenge, whereby an application moved under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was rejected.
In first round, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, even in second round, there was no representation.
Operative part
It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the case. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed on this count alone. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this petition is dismissed on this count alone
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 34.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.