Lakhan v. Ramesh Bhuneshwar Satrughan State oF ChhatUsgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR Criminal Revision No.120 of 2003 APPLICANT/: (Complainant:) NON-APPLICANTS: Lakhan Versus Ramesh Bhuneshwar Satrughan State oF ChhatUsgarh

{Criminal revision under SecUon 397 read with SecUon 401 of bhe Codeof Criminal Procedure} resenl:: None presenb For the applicanL Mr. Vij'ay Kumar Sahu, counsel For non-applicants No.1 to 3. Mr. Anil S. Pandey, GovL Advocabe For the Sbate/non-applicant: No.4. Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Shamna. J ORDER (26-11-2013) 1. When the matter is called For hearing, none present For bhe applicanb. No represenbaUon is made.

Counsel For non-applicants No.1 to 3 and counsel For the State/non-applicant No.4 are heard. Revision, judgments and records oF both bhe Courts below perused.

By bhis revision, the applicant: has challenged inadequacy oF senbence passed in Criminal Appeal No.400/2002 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bemebara vide judgment: dated 4-2-2003, modiFying the judgment oF convicUon and order oF sentence dated 6-9-2002 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First class, Bemetara in Criminal Case No.179/2001, whereby bhe trial Court has convicted non- applicant: No.1 herein under SecUons 323, 323 read wibh SecUon 34 & 324 read wibh SecUon 34 oF the IPC; non-applicant: No.2 herein under SecUons 323 read with Section 34, 323 read wibh Section 34 & 324 oF the IPC; and non-applicant: No.3 herein under Sections 323, 323 & 324 read wibh Section 34 oF the IPC and sentenced each oF them to undergo Rl for three months, RI For three months & Rl For six months, respectively, same has been modiFied by the appellate Courl: and they were sentenced to pay Fine oF Rs.500/- each under Section 323 read with Secbion 34 oF the IPC, in deFault: Rl For bWQ monfchs and non-applicant No.2 has been sentenced to pay Fine oF Rs.1,500/- under Section 324 oF the IPC, in deFault Rl For six months.