Prakash Chandra Shrivastava v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 147, 148, 307, 323, 324, 379, 504
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER Mr.Arbind Kumar Mr.Ram Bilash Roy Raman 3 06-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for offence under Sections 147, 148, 379, 323, 324, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per F.I.R. itself, specific accusation of assault is against co- accused Mithilesh Prasad. So far as this petitioner is concerned, there is general and omnibus allegation. Petitioner has got clean antecedent.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner, in the event of arrest/surrender Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11231 of 2024(3) dt.06-05-2024 within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Siwan in connection with Bhagwanpur Hat P.S. Case No. 190 of 2020, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.