Lalit Paswan v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) annpurna/- U T
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : : For the Petitioner/s For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP. 2 07-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case in connection with Pusa P.S. Case No. 98 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner rather 6.750 liters of foreign liquor is said to have been recovered from the house of the petitioner. He further submits that recovery has been made from a joint house. He has no concern either with the seized liquor or the place of recovery or any trade of liquor. He has been falsely implicated in this case at the instance of his enemy. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.832 of 2024(2) dt.07-02-2024 para-3 of this application.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, recovery of liquor from the house of the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge him on anticipatory bail.
The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) annpurna/- U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.