Rajesh Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- KHATIM REZA
Outcome
Allowed
The application stands allowed
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 307, 323, 324, 341, 504, 506
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. The application stands allowed. (Khatim Reza, J) shyambihari/- U T
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA Mr. Pramod Kumar, Adv. Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ORAL ORDER 2 31-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Jhajha PS Case No. 34 of 2021, dated
03.02.2021, instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 341,323, 324,307,504,506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation in the First Information Report (for brevity ‘FIR’) is that the petitioners have abused and assaulted the sister-in-law of the informant with fists and slaps. When the informant tried to rescue her, petitioner no.1 assaulted the informant with Bhujali, causing injury on his left ear and forehead.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. It is Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3047 of 2024(2) dt.31-01-2024 submitted that petitioners and informant are close Gotiyas. It is also submitted that the nature of injury found on the person of the informant is simple, caused by hard and blunt substance. Copy of injury report is annexed as Annexure-2 to bail petition. As per statement made in para-3 of the bail petition, the petitioners have no criminal antecedents.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest / surrender of the petitioners within a period of six weeks from today, in connection with Jhajha PS Case No. 34 of 2021, they shall be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Jamui, or appropriate Court below, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
Operative part
The application stands allowed. (Khatim Reza, J) shyambihari/- U T
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The application stands allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 307, 323, 324, 341, 504, 506; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.