Indrajit Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
application stands disposed off
Provisions considered
Judgment
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s For the NHAI
Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Sajid Salim Khan – SC25 Mr. Dr. Maurya Vijay Chandra, Adv. Mrs. Preety Ranjan, Adv. : : : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 2 04-02-2025 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner, Learned Counsel for the State and Learned Counsel for the NHAI.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present writ petition has been filed for challenging the order dated 20.05.2017 passed by the Arbitrator-cum- Additional Collector, Aurangabad in L.A. Case No.81 of 2014- 15 whereas the application of the petitioner has been rejected (annexure-5). Patna High Court CWJC No.17714 of 2018(2) dt.04-02-2025
Counsel for the State raised preliminary objection and submits that the present matter is relating to acquisition of land under National Highways Act, 1956 and the provisions laid down under National Highways Act, 1956 (Act 48 of 1956) is applicable.
It transpires to this Court that the order under challenge is challengeable under section 3G (6), (7) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the Authority.
As such, the present writ petition stands disposed off directing the petitioner to avail remedy under the said Act within 30 days from today.
It is directed to the Court that if application is filed under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, within 30 days, then the limitation, if any, shall be condoned.
Operative part
With the aforesaid directions, the present writ application stands disposed off. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: application stands disposed off
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
National Highways Act, 1956; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.