Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- PURNENDU SINGH
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 323, 341, 498(A), 504
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84226 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2023 Thana- TILAUTHU District- Rohtas ====================================================== Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Singh Son Of Ram Janma Singh R/O Vill - Patluka, P.S. - Tilauthu, Distt. - Rohtas at Sasaram. Rakesh Kumar Singh @ Rakesh Kumar Son of Babunand Singh R/o vill - Patluka, P.S. - Tilauthu, Distt. - Rohtas at Sasaram. Versus ... ... Petitioner/s The State of Bihar. Sweta Devi @ Kumari Sweta Wife of Ravi Ranjan Kumari @ Moti R/o vill - Saina, Bhadokhra, P.O. - Bhadokhra, P.S. - Tilauthu, Distt. - Rohtas. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH Mr. Babu Nandan Prasad, Advocate Mr. Pushpa Sinha, APP ORAL ORDER 2 18-01-2024 Heard Mr. Babu Nandan Prasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Pushpa Sinha, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Tilauthu P.S. Case No. 123 of 2023 registered under Sections 341, 323, 498(A) and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the allegation made in the FIR, the informant was assaulted by her husband and other family members of her in-laws due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84226 of 2023(2) dt.18-01-2024 petitioners submits that the petitioners are co-villagers and they have been implicated in this case only they came to resolve the dispute between the parties.
Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.
Considering the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, considering the statement made in paragraph no.6 of the bail application that the role of the petitioners is that of mediators and inspite of that the petitioners have been dragged in this case for no offence, as alleged in the FIR. Court below is directed to release the petitioners on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Dehri-on-Sone, Rohtas in connection with Tilauthu P.S. Case No. 123 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. chn/- U (Purnendu Singh, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.