✦ Patna High Court

Praveen Kumar @ Pravind Kumar v. The State of Bihar bihar

AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 80889 of 2024CHANDRA PRAKASH2 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
CHANDRA PRAKASH

Outcome

Allowed

The application stands allowed

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 77. The application stands allowed. guddukr/- U T (Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

Judgment

====================================================== Appearance : Mr.Aman Vishal For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Binod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 19-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in connection with Rafiganj P.S. Case No. 287 of 2023 dated

25.06.2023 registered for the offence/s punishable u/ss 341, 323, 307, 324, 325, 504 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

As per the prosecution case, the informant namely, Krishna Yadav purchased 5 kattha land from the co-accused Ram Snehi Yadav, but he did not transfer the land till date. When the informant asked him to transfer the land, the F.I.R. named accused persons including the petitioners assaulted the informant and others with Sabal, Gadasa and sword, as a result of which they sustained head and hand injuries.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80889 of 2024(2) dt.19-02-2025 case. There is land dispute between the parties. It is further submitted that an altercation took place and both sides sustained injuries. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Similarly situated co-accused have already been granted anticipatory bail by this court vide order dated 24.01.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 79493 of 2023. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Aurangabad (Bihar) in connection with Rafiganj P.S. Case No. 287 of 2023, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Operative part

7.

The application stands allowed. guddukr/- U T (Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The application stands allowed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 34; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 80889 of 2024). ← Search more judgments