Kundan Kumar v. The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Khadya
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 02 May 2025
Outcome
Disposed of
The Request Petition stands disposed off
Provisions considered
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ss. 11, 11(6)
Judgment
The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Khadya Bhawan, Daroga Prasad Path, R-Block, Road No.- 2, Patna - 800001, through its Managing Director.
The Managing Director, The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Khadya Bhawan, Daroga Prasad Path, R-Block, Road No.- 2, Patna - 800001.
The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Lakhisarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s : :
Mr. Manish Prakash, Advocate Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 02-05-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. This application has been moved seeking appointment of an Arbitrator invoking the powers of this Court under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Patna High Court REQ. CASE No.116 of 2024 dt.02-05-2025
3. The petitioner and the respondents entered into an agreement dated 02.11.2015. The said agreement contains an arbitration clause as Clause 17. The petitioner’s firms invoked the arbitration clause by sending a notice under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an Arbitrator on
24.08.2024 (Annexure- P/2), but to no avail.
It is pleaded that the respondents have not settled the dispute till date and the dispute is of civil nature.
Today, there is no dispute about-(a) the legality, validity and binding effect of the written agreement entered into between the parties to the lis; (b) the existence of arbitration clause contained therein; (c) the existence of dispute(s) arising therefrom; (d) the dispute arising out of the agreement therefrom; (d) they being civil in nature; (e) no legal impediment in the adjudication of the dispute by the learned Arbitrator; (f) petitioner having exhausted the channel available for Patna High Court REQ. CASE No.116 of 2024 dt.02-05-2025 resolution of the dispute; (g) the respondent having failed to appoint an Arbitrator pursuant to the invocation of the arbitration clause by the petitioner.
As such, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Samarendra Pratap Singh, former Judge of the Patna High Court is appointed as the learned Arbitrator to adjudicate all disputes arising out of the agreement entered into between the parties to the lis.
All the pleas and issues raised, on merits, are left open to be considered and decided by the learned Arbitrator.
The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fee as per the schedule of the Act.
Since the dispute arises out of an agreement of the year 2015, the hearing be expedited.
The issue of limitation, if any, is left open to be raised before the Arbitral Tribunal.
Joint Registrar (List) is directed to communicate the order to the learned Arbitrator. Patna High Court REQ. CASE No.116 of 2024 dt.02-05-2025
Learned counsel for the parties also undertake to communicate the order to the learned Arbitrator.
The Arbitral Tribunal shall issue notice to the parties.
Operative part
The Request Petition stands disposed off in the above terms. (Ashutosh Kumar, ACJ) Sauravkrsinha/ Praveen-II- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date NAFR NA 03.05.2025 NA
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Request Petition stands disposed off
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — ss. 11, 11(6).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Patna High Court, on 02 May 2025.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.