✦ Patna High Court

Madhukar Singh @ Madhukar Raj v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 76727 of 2023CHANDRA PRAKASH2 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
CHANDRA PRAKASH

Outcome

Allowed

The application stands allowed

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 88. The application stands allowed. guddukr/- U T (Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

Judgment

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH Mr. Rajesh Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate Mr.Umesh Lal Verma, APP ORAL ORDER 2 20-12-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of three weeks from today.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

3.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in connection with Silao P.S. Case No. 138 of 2023 dated 14.05.2023 registered for the offence/s punishable u/ss 341, 323, 307, 504 and 379 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4.

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co- accused persons along with 4-5 unknown miscreants are alleged to have assaulted the nephew of the informant and snatched his mobile while he was returning from tuition.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76727 of 2023(2) dt.20-12-2023 the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The injured sustained two injuries, one is abrasion over right parietal region of head and the second is swelling and tenderness over both palm. The injuries are simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner.

7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the allegation being general and omnibus, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Bihar Sharif, Nalanda in connection with Silao P.S. Case No. 138 of 2023, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Operative part

8.

The application stands allowed. guddukr/- U T (Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The application stands allowed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 34; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 76727 of 2023). ← Search more judgments