RAJESH KUMAR PASWAN v. The State of Bihar

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Dr. Bidhu Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR Mr.N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Adv. Mr.Bharat Bhushan 3 15-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned ORAL ORDER APP for the State. The instant application for regular bail has been filed by the petitioner instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 376, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4/6 of the POCSO Act. It is a case of commission of rape by the petitioner upon the minor girl, aged about 14 years, resulting into pregnancy of 4-5 months. The alleged occurrence took palce in absence of the parents of the victim girl. Petitioner is uncle of the victim girl and both are living in the same courtyard. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Informant and father of the petitioner are brothers and they are living in a same courtyard. Due to some previous Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74052 of 2022(3) dt.15-05-2023 enmity between the parties, he has been falsely implicated in this case. Victim has given tutored statement u/s 164 Cr.P.C. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 19.09.2022. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail and submitted that petitioner is named in the FIR. During investigation, several witnesses have supported the prosecution story. Statement of the victim girl was got recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., wherein she has made direct allegation of rape against the petitioner. Medical report also corroborates the prosecution case and confirm her pregnancy of 4-5 months. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that petitioner has exploited the victim girl physically, mentally and socially, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and, as such, his application for bail is rejected. the trial. The trial court is directed to expedite and conclude sushma/- U (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)