RANI KUMARI v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120(B), 419, 420
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Permission is granted. Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER Mr.Amar Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr.Anil Kumar, APP 2 01-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No.422 of 2023 dated 04.07.2023, registered for the offence punishable u/s 419, 420, 120(B) of the IPC and 10 of Bihar Conduct of Examination Act, 1981, pending in the Court of A.C.J.M. 1st, Rosera (Samastipur).
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Operative part
Permission is granted. Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn.
However, petitioner is at liberty to surrender before the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74608 of 2023(2) dt.01-12-2023 learned Court below within six weeks from today and seek regular bail and the learned Court below would pass the order, preferably, on the same day, in accordance with law, without being prejudiced of the withdrawal of this application, considering that the petitioner is a lady and has no criminal antecedent. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 120(B), 419, 420.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.