SURESH SINGH v. NARESH RAI @ SADHU
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 201, 304(B)
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Accordingly, this cancellation bail application is rejected. However, the trial Court is directed to conclude the trial of the case arising out of Chandi P.S. Case No. 113 of 2022 within six months from today by holding the trial on day to day basis.…
Judgment
THE STATE OF BIHAR BIHAR Versus
NARESH RAI @ SADHU S/O LATE NAGINA RAI VILLAGE- NARAHI, PS. CHANDI, DIST. BHOJPUR ... ... Petitioner/s ... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : : For the Petitioner/s For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR Mr.Bajarangi Lal Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey ORAL ORDER 2 24-07-2026 Heard the parties.
2. This application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for setting aside the order dated 01.02.2023 passed by the learned ACJM-V, Bhojpur at Ara in Chandi P.S. Case No. 113 of 2022 registered for the offence under Section 304(B), 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code by which the Court below has granted regular bail to the opposite party no. 02.
I have perused the impugned order granting bail to the opposite party no. 2 and do not find any error in the said order. Further, the petitioner has not been able to show any good ground to interfere with the impugned order granting bail to the opposite party no.2. Hence, no ground for cancellation of bail is Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78093 of 2023(2) dt.24-07-2026 made out.
Accordingly, this cancellation bail application is rejected. However, the trial Court is directed to conclude the trial of the case arising out of Chandi P.S. Case No. 113 of 2022 within six months from today by holding the trial on day to day basis. He is also directed to file a compliance report in this Court after six months or after conclusion of the trial, whichever is earlier.
Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bhojpur through FAX for its compliance. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.