✦ Patna High Court

Chandrawati Devi v. The State of Bihar Bihar

AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 76227 of 2023CHANDRA PRAKASH2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

This application stands allowed

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 88. This application stands allowed. guddukr/- U T (Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

Judgment

2.

Nand Kishore Sharma Son Of R/O Mohalla- Dahiyawan Jagdamab Road, P.S.- Chapra Town, District-Saran. The State of Bihar Bihar Versus ... ... Petitioner/s ... ... Opposite Party/s

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH Mr. Avnish Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr.Akshay Lal Pandit, APP ORAL ORDER 2 02-12-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of three weeks from today.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

3.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case in connection with Chapra Town P.S. Case No. 243 of 2023 dated

16.03.2023 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 363 and 366A read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4.

As per the prosecution case, the co-accused Amit Kumar along with the petitioners and his brothers is alleged to have kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant for the purpose of marriage. It is further alleged that when the informant went to the petitioners' house for enquire about, all the accused person including the petitioners started abusing and threatened to kill. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76227 of 2023(2) dt.02-12-2023

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners are the mother and the father of the co-accused Amit Kumar. There is no specific allegation against the petitioners. There is no allegation of kidnapping against the petitioner as per statement recorded under section 164 of the Cr.P.C. It is further submitted that the victim was not forced to have illicit intercourse with another person. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.

7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court concerned, Saran, Chapra in connection with Chapra Town P.S. Case No. 243 of 2023, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Operative part

8.

This application stands allowed. guddukr/- U T (Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: This application stands allowed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 34; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 164, 438(2).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 76227 of 2023). ← Search more judgments