NIBHASH KUMAR @ BIBHASH KUMAR v. The State of Bihar Bihar

The State of Bihar Bihar Soni Kumari D/O Lakhsman Kumar Resident of Village- Bahadur Pur, P.S.- Alauli, District- Khagaria ... ... Opposite Party/s

====================================================== Appearance : Mr.Shekhar Kumar Singh : For the Petitioner/s For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 19-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the opposite party no.2.

2. The petitioner, who is husband of opposite party no.2, apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner offers and undertakes that he is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3000/-per month, starting from this month to the opposite party no.2.

In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3000/- per month, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71085 of 2022(3) dt.19-09-2023 satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in Khagaria (Muffasil) Police Station Case No. 571 of 2022, GR No. 1603 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as on the following conditions:- (i) Opposite party no.2. would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her saving bank account number for its communication to the petitioner. (ii) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid maintenance amount per month in the saving bank account of the opposite party no.2. (iii) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the maintenance amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond. (iv) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise. shashi/- U T (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)