AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 72362 of 2023 · Patna High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- CHANDRA PRAKASH
Outcome
Allowed
This application stands allowed
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 34
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. This application stands allowed. (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T
Judgment
Md. Zafir Akhtar @ Md. Jafir Son Of Sami Akhtar Resident Of Village- Dakahi, Ward No. 5, P.S.- Andhramath, District- Madhubani
Md. Jamil Akhtar @ Jamil Akhtar Son Of Md. Sami Akhtar Resident Of Village- Dakahi, Ward No. 5, P.S.- Andhramath, District- Madhubani The State of Bihar Versus ... ... Petitioner/s ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== : For the Petitioner/s For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH Mr.Manish Kumar No 13, Advocate Mr.Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ORAL ORDER 2 09-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case in connection with Andhramath P.S. Case No. 151 of 2022 dated
31.10.2022 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 341, 447, 323, 354B, 379, 504, 506 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners and the co-accused persons are alleged to have came at the door of the informant with various arms and assaulted the informant. The co- accused Md. Jubair pointed pistol on the forehead of the informant and started abusing the informant and threatened to forcibly kidnapped his grand daughter. Thereafter, the co-accused Md. Jubair also molested informant’s grand daughter by pulling her Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72362 of 2023(2) dt.09-11-2023 dupatta. It is further alleged that the accused persons also committed theft of Rs. 5000/-
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioners have no concern with the alleged offence. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court concerned, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Andhramath P.S. Case No. 151 of 2022, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Operative part
This application stands allowed. (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This application stands allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 34; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.