Umesh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
case, this anticipatory bail is allowed
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120(B), 420, 467, 468, 471
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this anticipatory bail is allowed. Let the above named petitioner, in the event of arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.…
Judgment
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2023 Thana- MOHAMMADPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Umesh Kumar Singh son of Late Bachcha Singh @ Late Rajeshwar Prasad Village- Sarar P.S -Barauli District -Gopalganj Versus ... ... Petitioner The State of Bihar The Police Inspector-cum-Assistant Investigating, vigilance, Investigation Bureau, Patna bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER Mr.Lokesh Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr.Ajay Mishra, A.P.P. 2 27-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioner, being Panchayat Secretary, issued employment certificate on the basis of forged and fabricated document(s) to co-accused Anu Kumari on the basis of which she secured job of Panchayat teacher.
It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that after verification of all educational certificates by the concerned department, employment letter had been issued by the committee of 7 members of which petitioner was one of them. Petitioner had no mechanism to verify papers submitted by the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74930 of 2024(2) dt.27-03-2025 petitioner who retired in 2022. Moreover, co-accused Anu Kumari has already been granted pre-arrest bail by a bench of this Court vide paragraph 7 of the bail petition.
Learned counsel for the State does not controvert this fact.
Operative part
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this anticipatory bail is allowed. Let the above named petitioner, in the event of arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VII, Gopalganj in Mohammadpur Police Station Case No.03/2023, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Shashi U T (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: case, this anticipatory bail is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 120(B), 420, 467, 468, 471; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.