✦ Patna High Court

Manini Jaiswal v. The State of Bihar

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with

Key paragraphs

  • Para 88. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna. The District Magistrate cum District Election Officer Sasaram, Rohtas. The Superintendent of Police Sasaram, Rohtas. The Chief Election Commissioner Bihar Mangles Road Patna. The Deputy Election Officer, Sasaram, Rohtas. The Special Vigilance…

Judgment

Judgment

#8. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna. The District Magistrate cum District Election Officer Sasaram, Rohtas. The Superintendent of Police Sasaram, Rohtas. The Chief Election Commissioner Bihar Mangles Road Patna. The Deputy Election Officer, Sasaram, Rohtas. The Special Vigilance Unit, Government of Bihar, Patna through Additional Director General of Police SVU, 5, Daroga Rai Path Patna. S.K. Offset Printers, G.T. Road, Sasaram-821115 (Rohtas). Jay Multimedia, Below Hotel Jay Deluxe, G.T. Road, Inderchand Market, Sasaram (Rohtas). ... ... Respondent/s Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s : :

Ms.Ankita Kumari, Advocate Mr.P.K. Verma (AAG-3) Mr. Siddhartha Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) ===================================================== (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon’ble the Chief Justice/ Hon’ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also, the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.) ===================================== Patna High Court CWJC No.18559 of 2022(2) dt.20-01-2023 2 20-01-2023 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- After the matter was heard for some time, finding the Court not to be in favour of the submissions made across the Bar, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition reserving liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law. Permission granted. We are sure that as and when any such proceedings are initiated, before the appropriate forum/Tribunal, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously, in accordance with law. Needless to add, period for which the petitioner has Patna High Court CWJC No.18559 of 2022(2) dt.20-01-2023 been pursuing the matter before this Court, shall be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation. It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on merits. All issues are left open. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) (Partha Sarthy, J) P.K.P./Amrendra U

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No. 18559 of 2022). ← Search more judgments