Dipesh Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing
Provisions considered
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act s. 30(a)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, Advocate Ms. Shaheen Begum, APP ORAL ORDER 2 24-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
The petitioner and other co-accused were arrested on the spot and on search, 216 litres illicit liquor was recovered from the motorcycle which is registered in the name of petitioner’s mother.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is not the owner of motorcycle in question. Nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has no concern either with the seized liquor or the seized motorcycle. There is no independent witness of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69188 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 seizure list. Charge sheet has already been submitted after investigation and there is no chance of tampering with the evidence or absconding the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in jail since 02.08.2025 (although wrongly mentioned as 05.08.2025 in the bail petition) having no criminal antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the trial.
Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Operative part
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions of the parties and period of custody, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Araria in connection with Fulkaha P.S. Case No.109 of 2025. Harish/- U T (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act — s. 30(a).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.