Upendra Rawpal @ Upendra Pal v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
petitioner, this application is allowed
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 307, 323, 341, 365, 366, 504, 506
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 164
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Considering the nature of allegation levelled Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71428 of 2023(2) dt.07-11-2023 against the petitioner as well as the period of custody of the petitioner, this application is allowed.
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : : For the Petitioner For the Opposite Party : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR Mr. Ratanakar Jha, Advocate Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP ORAL ORDER 2 07-11-2023 Heard Sri Ratanakar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Akshay Lal Pandit, learned APP for the State.
This application for grant of regular bail arises out of Ladaniya P.S. Case No.109 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 365 & 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The first wife of the informant, aged about 35 years, had gone missing and the informant has alleged that the petitioner is involved in disappearance of his first wife.
The alleged victim in her statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. has said that she was taken to Nepal and Bengaluru for a quite long time by the accused persons. The petitioner is in custody since 10.08.2023.
Operative part
Considering the nature of allegation levelled Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71428 of 2023(2) dt.07-11-2023 against the petitioner as well as the period of custody of the petitioner, this application is allowed.
Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, III, Madhubani, in connection with Ladaniya P.S. Case No.109 of
2023. (Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petitioner, this application is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 307, 323, 341, 365, 366, 504, 506; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 164.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.