Amit Kumar @ Anish Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 307, 323, 341, 379, 427, 504
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s. 482(2)
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.
- Para 77. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned…
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner For the State ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER Mr. Dhirendra Prasad Sinha, Advocate Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, APP : : 2 24-09-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 427, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, stopped the vehicle of informant and committed assault and damaged the vehicle. It is further alleged that the accused persons also snatched cash and ornaments.
It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67756 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 against this petitioner. As per injury report, two injuries were found on the body of Santosh Ray and one injury was found on the body of Ashok Ray, which does not corroborates with the allegations made in the F.I.R.. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.
Operative part
Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Jurawanpur P.S. Case No. 45 of 2021, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. shashank/- U T (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 307, 323, 341, 379, 427, 504; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.