TETAR RAY v. The State of Bihar Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this application is dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER Mrs. Anjana Mrs. Anita Kumari 2 06-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual Court proceedings. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Barh P.S. Case no.321 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable u/s 30 (a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act,
Operative part
2016. Altogether 520 liters of country made liquor as well as liquor packing machine is said to have been recovered from the spot. Two persons were apprehended on the spot and they disclosed the name of the petitioner and other accused persons. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. He has no concern either with the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67784 of 2022(2) dt.06-01-2023 seized liquor or any trade of liquor. He has been falsely implicated in this case at the instance of his enemy. He was not apprehended on the spot and his name transpired in the case only on the basis of statement of apprehended co-accused persons. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent of similar nature. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that petitioner is also involved in the manufacturing of illicit liquor. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this application is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 — s. 30(a).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.