DILIP MAHTO @ DILIP KUMAR @ HAJARA v. THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 147, 148, 149, 302, 379
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA Mr.Jai Prakash Singh Mr.Amit Kumar Rakesh ORAL ORDER 2 03-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 77 of 2022 registered for the offence under sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing specific is alleged against this petitioner. The specific allegation of assault is against co-acused Digaj Kumar. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68184 of 2022(2) dt.03-02-2023 furnishing personal bond to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate Begusarai in connection with Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 77 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. mcv/- U T (Arvind Srivastava, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.