Rohit Raj @ Ranjan Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 392
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : Mr.Amrendra Kumar For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 2 02-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution case in nutshell is that 3 motorcycle borne miscreants snatched the motorcycle of the informant on the point of pistol and fled away.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Neither the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69202 of 2023(2) dt.02-11-2023 petitioner is named in F.I.R. nor he has been put on T.I.P. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from his possession. The name of petitioner sprang up in this case on confessional statement of co-accused Rajesh Kumar Yadav. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 19.10.2022. Similarly situated co- accused person, namely, Rajesh yadav has been granted bail by this Court passed in Cr. Misc. No. 33228 of
Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for Bail.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 178 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69202 of 2023(2) dt.02-11-2023 to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate III, Naugachia, Bhagalpur. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Nirajkrs/- U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.