Sanjay Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
The Panchayat Secretary cum Member Secretary, Teachers Employment Unit, Bhopatpur Gram Panchayat, Kuchaikot, District-Gopalganj.
Dharmendra Prasad, Son of Mahajan Prasad, Resident of Village- Bhibherwa, Police Station-Gopalganj, District-Gopalganj. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mr.Dewanand Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Mithilesh Kr. Singh, AC to SC 15 For the Respondent/s ======================================================= CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR : ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 22-09-2025 Heard the parties.
The petitioner has invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction upon the respondent authorities to comply the order dated 16.03.2024 passed by the District Appellate Authority, Gopalganj, Bihar in Appeal Case No. Patna High Court CWJC No.15639 of 2025 dt.22-09-2025 107/2024 preferred in terms with the order dated 22.12.2023 passed in CWJC No. 19725 of 2021, by which the respondent Block Employment Unit, Kuchaikot has been directed to issue employment letter within 30 days.
Prima facie, this Court has shown displeasure to the relief sought for in the present writ petition as the jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked for executing the order passed by the District Appellate Authority. However, learned Advocate for the petitioner fairly submitted that notwithstanding the fact the Miscellaneous Case No. 22/2024 has been filed for execution of the order of the District Appellate Authority dated 22.12.2023 long back on 04.09.2024 but till date it has not been brought to its logical conclusion and the petitioner has been deprived from fruits of the afore noted order dated 22.12.2023.
Learned Advocate for the State submitted that the Appellate Authority is the competent to take appropriate action against the officers concerned in case of non compliance of the order/direction as provided under Rule 16 of the Bihar State Teaching Institutions Teachers and Employees (Dispute Redressal and Appeal) Rules, 2020.
Having considered the facts of the case and Patna High Court CWJC No.15639 of 2025 dt.22-09-2025 submissions advanced, this Court, only in the interest of justice, deems it proper to direct the District Appellate Authority, Gopalganj to take up the Miscellaneous Case No. 22/2024 and bring it to its logical conclusion, preferably within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
The writ petition stands disposed. (Harish Kumar, J) Anjani/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date
24.09.2025
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Patna High Court, on 22 Sep 2025. The bench was HARISH KUMAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.