Amar Lal Deo v. The State Of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act ss. 30(a), 32, 41
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. The application stands allowed. (Khatim Reza, J) J. Alam/- U T
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, Advocate Mr. Rajiv Nayan, APP ORAL ORDER 2 07-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Baheri PS Case No.50 of 2023 dated 27.02.2023, instituted under Sections 120-B, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 32 and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
The prosecution case, in short, is that the police got secret information about the illicit liquor upon which a raid was committed. When the police personnel reached near Hanuman temple, they found that cartons were unloading from the truck bearing registration no. RJ 06GC 5277 and loading on a pick up van. A Xylo vehicle was also parked near the said vehicles. Upon seeing the police party, all the persons tried to run away. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 65519 of 2023(2) dt.07-11-2023 They were chased but only two persons, namely, Sonu Kumar and Baidynath Kumar Yadav could be arrested. They named several persons including the petitioner, who were involved in bootlegging. Upon search, total 5999.52 litres foreign liquor was recovered from the truck as well as pickup van apart from cash etc.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not the owner of any of the vehicles which were seized. Nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the recovered illicit liquor. Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioner has four criminal cases against him.
Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.
Operative part
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge- 1st, Excise Act, Darbhanga, in Baheri PS Case No.50 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 65519 of 2023(2) dt.07-11-2023 further (i) that the petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below, (ii) that one of the bailors will be his own blood relation, preferably father, mother, brother, sister and or his wife, (iii) that the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is made accused in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, and (iv) that if the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
The application stands allowed. (Khatim Reza, J) J. Alam/- U T
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860; Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act — ss. 30(a), 32, 41; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.