Sumariya Devi @ Somariya Devi v. The State Of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
The application stands allowed
Provisions considered
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA Mr.Pramod Kumar Mr.Shantanu Kumar ORAL ORDER 2 24-09-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 47 and 52 of the Excise Act.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman the allegation is of recovery of 16 litres of liquor from the house of six different accused persons including 03 litres of liquor from the house of the petitioner.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from her conscious possession and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69041 of 2024(2) dt.24-09-2024 after Amendment in the Excise Act, 2018, the concept of deemed possession and presumed offender has been done away with and he came to be implicated based on secret information, which is the easiest way to implicate someone.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above- named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on her furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge Excise-III, Patna in connection with Masaurhi P. S. Case No.304 of 2016, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
Operative part
The application stands allowed.
It is made clear that the learned trial Court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69041 of 2024(2) dt.24-09-2024 that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to. vikash/- U T (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The application stands allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Excise Act, 2018; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.