Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 147, 148, 149, 323, 337, 341, 353, 427, 504
Judgment
Ms.Rupa Kumari, Advocate Ms.Rina Sinha Mr. J. N. Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 01-06-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within one month. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 135 of 2014 registered for offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 504, 337, 323, 353, 427 of the Indian Penal Code and section 17 of C.L.A. Act. As per allegation, the petitioner was one of the thousand extremists, who attacked the C.R.P.F. camp and attempted to break the door of camp and started pelting stones. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that on similar allegation, co-accused Guddu Kumar and Dukhi Singh Bhokta @ Dukhi Singh have been granted bail by the coordinate Benches of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 18215 of 2019 and Cr. Misc. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1330 of 2022(2) dt.01-06-2022 No. 601 of 2018 respectively. The petitioner is under custody since
26.10.2021. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 135 of 2014, subject to the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. (ii) If the petitioner is found involved in future in the similar type of offence, the prosecution will have liberty to file an application before the court below for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner and the learned court below will take decision in accordance with law. Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time mentioned hereinabove, failing which, the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court. Mahesh/- U T (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.