✦ Patna High Court

M/S Manokamna Food Products v. The State of Bihar

JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No. 13833 of 2007CHIEF, KISHORE K MANDAL

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

Writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J AMIN/-

Judgment

Mr. S. D.Sanjay For the Petitioner : For the Respondents 1 & 2: Mr. Lalit Kishore, A.A.G. III & Mr. Ashok Kumar Dubey, J.C. to A.A.G. III ------------ P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal ------------ Dated, the 20th November, 2008. Mr. S. D. Sanjay, counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition for the reliefs claimed in this writ petition as well as challenge to the constitutional validity to the Bihar Entry of Goods into Local Areas for Consumption, Use or Sale Therein (Amendment and Validation) Act, 2008 (Bihar Act 13 of 2008).

2.

Counsel for the petitioner, however, prayed that until a fresh writ petition is filed by the petitioner, the interim order passed by this Court on 27th February, 2008 be allowed to remain operative. - 2 -

3.

We may immediately observe that once the main petition is withdrawn, the interim order passed therein cannot be continued. However, the interest of the petitioner is safeguarded by the statement of the Additional Advocate General III that if a fresh writ petition is filed within one month from today, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner to realize entry tax exceeding 1% on wheat for a period of one month which we accept.

Operative part

4.

Writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed. R. M. Lodha, CJ Kishore K. Mandal, J AMIN/-

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Companies Act, 2013; Sale Therein (Amendment and Validation) Act, 2008.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No. 13833 of 2007). ← Search more judgments