Natwar Chand Poddar @ Natwar Chandra Poddar v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. XLVII r. 7
Judgment
: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Mr. Surendra Kumar Choubey, Advocates. For the Respondent-State: Mr. Amarendra Kumar, A.C. to G.P.-8. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2 26-04-2013 Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 21st November 2012 made by the learned single Judge in Civil Review No. 10 of 2012, the petitioner has preferred this Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. An appeal against the order rejecting review application is not maintainable as envisaged by Order XLVII Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Appeal is Accordingly dismissed. (R.M. Doshit, CJ) Sujit/- (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. XLVII r. 7.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Patna High Court, on 21 Nov 2012. The bench was AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.