RAM JOKHAN PANDIT @ JOKHAN PANDIT v. Parwati Devi
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 ss. 9, 24
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 397, 401
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 115
- Constitution of India art. 227
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the State ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI Mr. Shashi Shekhar Mrs. Asha Kumari, APP : : 2 08-04-2024 The instant revision per se is not maintainable ORAL ORDER because of the fact that in a suit for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, upon the application filed by the opposite party under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The learned Judge, Family Court at Sitamarhi passed an order of alimony pendente lite from the date of the application. This order is not revisable under Section 397/401 of the CrPC. The order is revisable under Section 115 of the CPC read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Since, the same is not maintainable, the instant revision is summarily dismissed. Suraj Dubey/- U T (Bibek Chaudhuri, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.