Jagdish Prasad Sah @ Jagdish Sah v. Mithilesh Kuamr Sah @ Mithiles
Case at a glance
- Bench
- V NATH
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.469 of 2010 ====================================================== Jagdish Prasad Sah @ Jagdish Sah Versus .... .... Petitioner/s Mithilesh Kuamr Sah @ Mithiles .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Manoj Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 2 23-04-2012 Mr. Dr. Manoj Kumar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the impugned order is interlocutory in nature and the revision application is not maintainable. He has prayed to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in view of the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Durga Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar Poddar, reported in 2010 (2) PLJR 954. The prayer is allowed. The petitioner is granted four weeks time to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to the bench. Devendra/- (V. Nath, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.