Amarnath Kumar @ Amar Das v. The State Of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- DINESH KUMAR
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 409, 420
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 04-09-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 409 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner is of committing irregularity in the schemes. The petitioner was not named in the FIR but subsequently the name of the petitioner sprang up as supplier. It is submitted that the FIR named Mukhia and ex Mukhia were granted anticipatory bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 8344 of
2010. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32102 of 2012 (2) dt.04-09-2012 satisfaction of learned CJM, Begusarai in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 192 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Anil/-
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.