RAVI KUMAR GUPTA v. STATE OF BIHAR

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that though there is allegation regarding demand, torture for its non-fulfilment and keeping all the ornaments by in-laws including the petitioner but reality is otherwise that complainant has relation with her Bhanoi. After the marriage also he was in the habit of coming to petitioner’s house which was objected but he misbehaved with the lady members also for which a case was lodged by petitioner’s mother on 4.8.2008. Finding the incident true chargesheet was submitted on 31.8.2008 and thereafter on the next day this case with vague and general allegation was lodged which never can be based for petitioner’s arrest. I agree with the submission. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest or surrender within one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order the above named petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, in connection with Agamkuan P.S. case no.192 of 2008 , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sudip ( Mandhata Singh, J )