HUDDIN ANSARI v. STATE OF BIHAR
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SHYAM KISHORE SHARMA
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120B, 399, 402
- Arms Act, 1959
- Explosive Substance Act ss. 3, 4
Judgment
FIR has been registered under Sections 399, 402, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 2 25 (1-B)/26/35 of the Arms Act and Section 3/4 of the Explosive Substance Act, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The police has got some secret information criminals were assembling under a tree and were making preparation to commit some serious crime. A raiding party was organized and in course of raid some persons were apprehended. One loaded country made pistol and a live cartridge was recovered from possession of petitioner Huddin Ansari. From petitioner Md. Unsahaque one bag containing some materials which were likely to be used in the preparation of bombs were recovered. From petitioner Chhotelal Mandal @ Tuntun Mandal one country made pistol and a live cartridge was recovered. From petitioner Mangal Chaudhary one Kulhari and a mobile phone have been recovered. From petitioners Sk. Nazir one 3 dagger, Sk. Habib and Sk. Fotish Dabiya were recovered. The petitioners Huddin Ansari and Md. Unsahaque are in custody since
06.10.2008, Mangal Chaudhary is in custody since 05.10.2008, Chhotelal Mandal @ Tuntun Mandal is in custody since 06.10.2008 and petitioners Sk. Nazir, Sk. Habib and Sk. Fotish are in custody since 16.01.2008. Considering circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar/concerned court in connection with Barsoi P.S. Case No.-146 of 2008. kksinha/ (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.