✦ Patna High Court · 17 Oct 2011

Lal Bihari Singh v. The State of Bihar

Letters Patent Appeal No. 2010 of 2011ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Appeal is dismissed

Provisions considered

Judgment

: Mr. Phulen Yadav, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Parth Sarthi, G.A. Mr. Mrigendra Kumar, A. C. to G. A. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 3 06-12-2013 This Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent has been preferred by the writ petitioner against the order dated 17th October 2011 made by the learned single Judge in CWJC No.4786 of 2007. The appellant is a retired Home Guard. Under order dated 11th November 1997 made by the respondent-authority, his Patna High Court LPA No.2010 of 2011 (3) dt.06-12-2013 date of birth recorded as 23rd November 1949 was altered to that of 1st September 1945. The appellant accepted the said order; allowed it to become final. In view of the said entry, he was retired from service in August 2003. More than three years after his retirement from service, the appellant has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution in above CWJC No.4786 of 2007 to challenge the action of his retirement in 2003. The learned single Judge has dismissed the writ petition. Therefore, this Appeal. Petition was contested by respondents. According to the respondents, the appellant had entered the service in 1968 at the age of 23 years as per his own declaration. The date of birth ‘23rd November 1949’ recorded more than 20 years after his joining the service was obviously incorrect and was ordered to be corrected after following the principles of natural justice. in limine. We see no merit in this Appeal. Appeal is dismissed (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Sunil/-

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Appeal is dismissed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Patna High Court, on 17 Oct 2011. The bench was ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Letters Patent Appeal No. 2010 of 2011). ← Search more judgments