SUNITA KUMARI v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ARVIND SRIVASTAVA
Outcome
Bail granted
case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120B, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
The State of Bihar THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE POLICE INSPECTOR, VIGILANCE INVESTIGATION BUREAU, BIHAR, PATNA BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s
Operative part
====================================================== Appearance : Mr. Ravindra Kumar For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 4 23-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bakhri P.S. Case No. 41 of 2022 registered under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to dirty village politics. Petitioner is a Panchayat Teacher. Further he submits that the petitioner has already submitted his resignation from the service to the District Education Officer through registered post, as recorded in supplementary affidavit (Annexure-3). It is also Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57229 of 2022(4) dt.23-03-2023 submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing personal bond to the satisfaction of Sub-Judge-cum-A.C.J.M.-VI, Begusarai in connection with Bakhri P.S. Case No. 41 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. shailendra/- U T (Arvind Srivastava, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 120B, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.