Ful Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
this application is disposed of
Judgment
Operative part
.... .... Respondents ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 08-05-2013 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner has a grievance against the selection of the respondent no.6 on the post of Anganbari Sevika and that she has already moved the competent authority namely the Collector of the Purnea district by filing her representation in the form of complaint dated 6.9.2012 as contained in Annexure-5, this Court would direct the Collector of Purnea district to ensure that the aforesaid complaint cum representation of the petitioner is disposed of within a period of four months from the date of receipt of this order but only after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as also the respondent no.6. Patna High Court CWJC No.7226 of 2013 (2) dt.08-05-2013 With the aforementioned observations and direction, this application is disposed of. (Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Rishi/-
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.