RAMESH CHANDRA JHA v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 308, 323, 341, 379, 504
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER Mr.Ratanakar Jha, Adv. Mr.Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP 2 23-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 341, 323, 308, 504, 379/34 IPC. The petitioner is said to have assaulted the son of informant by means of paghariya on his head and hand. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to enmity. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. It is submitted that the injury sustained by the informant’s son is simple in nature, which is clear from the impugned order. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57862 of 2022(2) dt.23-02-2023 Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since the injury is simple in nature, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Pandaul P.S. Case No.73/2020 (C.R.I. No.574/2020), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. pallavi/- U T (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.