Sunita Kumari @ Sunita Devi v. The State Of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
This writ application is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. The State Of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, Begusarai 3. The District Superintendent Of Education Cum District Programme Co- Ordinator Begusaria 4. The Block Education Officer Block Barauni District Begusarai 5. Teh Acting Headmaster Cum Secretary Maha Dalit Samiti Upgraded Middle School Roopnagar Block…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13741 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Sunita Kumari @ Sunita Devi W/O Mantun Rajak R/O Vill.- Post Simaria Ghat, Ps..- Barauni, Distt.- Begusarai Versus .... .... Petitioner/s
Operative part
The State Of Bihar 2. The District Magistrate, Begusarai 3. The District Superintendent Of Education Cum District Programme Co- Ordinator Begusaria 4. The Block Education Officer Block Barauni District Begusarai 5. Teh Acting Headmaster Cum Secretary Maha Dalit Samiti Upgraded Middle School Roopnagar Block Barauni, Dist.- Begusarai 6. The B.R.P Block Barauni Distt.- Begusarai 7. The Co-Ordinator Sankul Resources Centre Middle School, Simaria(Barauni) Distt.- Begusarai 8. The Up-Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Simaria Ii, Block Barauni , Distt- Begusarai 9. The President Maha Dalit Samiti Gram Panchayt Raj Simaria Ii, Block Barauni, Distt.- Begusarai .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajkumar Rajesh For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.A. Alam Sc3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 2 13-03-2012 Nature of the dispute being such, there is no constitutional or fundamental right of the petitioner to move this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as the so called appointment going to be made as Dalit Tola Worker is not a civil post under the State. This writ application is dismissed. Amin/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) Patna High Court CWJC No.13741 of 2011 (2) dt.13-03-2012
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This writ application is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.