Radha Devi v. The State Of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The application stands disposed of, as withdrawn, with
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 216, 323
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. The State Of Bihar 2. Abhinandan Mehta 3. Laltu Mehta, both are S/o Haricharan Mehta 4. Haricharan Mehta, S/o late Mangal Mehta, all are R/o of Latraha, P.O.- Lokha, P.S.- & District- Supaul .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1480 of 2008 ====================================================== Radha Devi W/o Becho Paudar, R/o village- Latraha, P.O.- Lokha, P.S. & District- Supaul Versus .... .... Petitioner/s
Operative part
The State Of Bihar 2. Abhinandan Mehta 3. Laltu Mehta, both are S/o Haricharan Mehta 4. Haricharan Mehta, S/o late Mangal Mehta, all are R/o of Latraha, P.O.- Lokha, P.S.- & District- Supaul .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Vikram Deo Singh, Advocate For the State of Bihar : M/s. Reena Sinha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 17-09-2012 After having heard the matter for some time, in view of the availability of alternative remedy under section 216 as also under section 323 Cr.P.C., the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to raise all the issues, which have been raised in the present proceeding, during the course of trial at an appropriate stage. Permission is accorded. The application stands disposed of, as withdrawn, with liberty aforesaid RPS/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The application stands disposed of, as withdrawn, with
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 216, 323.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.