Deendayal Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Provisions considered
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : Mr.Dr. Manoj Kumar For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Meena Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 18-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30a, 30c of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (Amendment Act 2018). As per the prosecution case, 11 liters country made liquor was recovered from house of the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he is no way connected with the aforesaid recovery. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel for the State submits that 11 liters country made liquor was recovered from the house of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53799 of 2022(2) dt.18-11-2022 petitioner. He further submits that this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.) Considering the aforesaid facts, prayer for bail of the petitioner is refused with direction to surrender and seek regular bail which would be considered and disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. navya/- U T (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.