Sanjay Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In this view of the matter, we decline to entertain this writ petition. It is, accordingly, disposed of. However, this will not preclude the petitioner or any other affected person in prosecuting the remedy provided in the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006, against respondent…
Judgment
For the petitioner: Mr. Surendra Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anil Kumar, GP XI For the Election Commission: Mr. K.B. Nath, Advocate For the respondent no.10 : Mr. Aditya Narain Singh -I --- P R E S E N T Hon'ble the Chief Justice And Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal --- Dated, the 7th November, 2008 After having heard the counsel for the petitioner, we are satisfied that the controversy raised in this writ petition, which has been filed in the nature of public interest litigation, does not require to be entertained by this court.
If the respondent no.10 has incurred any disqualification (pre-election or post election) as Mukhiya of Rajpur Panchayat in Rajpur Block, the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2 2006, provides mechanism for removal of such candidate. Obviously, the process provided therein has to be followed.
In this view of the matter, we decline to entertain this writ petition. It is, accordingly, disposed of. However, this will not preclude the petitioner or any other affected person in prosecuting the remedy provided in the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006, against respondent no.10. R .M. Lodha, CJ. Kishore K. Mandal, J. Neyaz/-
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.