✦ Patna High Court

SUNIL RAI @ SUNIL KUMAR v. The State of Bihar

AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 51196 of 2022RAJIV ROY

Case at a glance

Outcome

Bail granted

Let the petitioner be released on bail, in the event of

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY Mr.Anish Chandra, Advocate Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ORAL ORDER 2 11-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Jurawanpur P.S. Case No. 145 of 2020 under sections 341, 323, 332, 333, 326, 353 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution story, the petitioner was needed in a criminal case and accordingly, when his house was raided, he in turn attacked the police personnel and after injuring one of them fled away. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that falsity of the FIR could be very well ascertained inasmuch as, the allegation is that the entire police raided the house of the petitioner, he alone managed not only to assault them but also escaped. Actually he worked under a Contractor, as he stopped Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51196 of 2022(2) dt.11-01-2023 working with him, all the cases are foisted upon him, he being a labourer. Taking into account the facts of the case also also the petitioner is a labourer and ultimately he has to face the trial, this Court is inclined to grant him relief. Let the petitioner be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IX, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Jurawanpur P.S. Case No. 145 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Ravi/- U T (Rajiv Roy, J)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Let the petitioner be released on bail, in the event of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 323, 326, 332, 333, 341, 353, 504; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 51196 of 2022). ← Search more judgments