CHHATRI YADAV v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- NAWNEET KUMAR
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 307, 323, 341, 379, 427, 504, 506
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY Mr.Rajesh Kumar Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari ORAL ORDER 2 13-01-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Gogari P.S. Case No. 494 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 427, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is case and counter case and the injuries suffered by the injured persons are simple in nature. The petitioner is a person of clean antecedents. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50096 of 2022(2) dt.13-01-2023 surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Gogari P.S. Case No. 494 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) SONALI/- U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.