DIPU KUMAR @ DIPU KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF BIHAR

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER Mr.Sanjay Kumar Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh 3 22-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, vehicle of informant with loaded TMT bars has been missing. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of petitioner has transpired in this case during the course of investigation. No incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. Considering the facts of the case, nature of accusation Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49761 of 2022(3) dt.22-12-2022 and clean antecedent of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest/ surrender within a period of six weeks from today shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Patna City, Patna in connection with Malsalami PS case No. 250/ 2022, subject to conditions laid down u/s 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. BKS/- U T (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)