Mukesh Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 272, 273
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 s. 30(a)
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR Mr. Jitendra Bharti Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal ORAL ORDER 2 30-08-2024 This is an application for grant of Anticipatory Bail to the petitioners, who apprehend their arrest in connection with Andhramath P.S. Case No. 85 of 2024 registered for the offences under Section 272, 273 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022.
Learned counsel for the petitioners; Shri Jitendra Bharti prays for withdrawing this application.
Permission is accorded.
Operative part
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this application is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 272, 273; Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 — s. 30(a).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.