Binoy Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
Let the petitioner be released on bail on
Provisions considered
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA Mr. Indeshwari Mandal, Advocate Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ORAL ORDER 3 28-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sajour P.S. Case No. 01 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 120-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Prosecution case in a nutshell is that co-accused persons including the petitioner have killed the son of the informant by hatching conspiracy.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 05-03-2024. Petitioner is a man of clean antecedent.
It has been further submitted by the petitioner’s Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52495 of 2024(3) dt.28-10-2024 counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of confessional statement of co- accused, namely, Brajesh Yadav. Learned counsel next submits that police after investigation has submitted charge sheet in this case. It is submitted that there is no specific allegation alleged against the petitioner, rather allegation is general and omnibus in nature.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. It is submitted that petitioner was holding the deceased, while co- accused, namely, Brajesh Yadav and Manoj Sah, opened fired upon the deceased, which fact is corroborated by the confessional statements of both the co-accused. It is next submitted that CDR of the petitioner was found to be near place of occurrence.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
Operative part
Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52495 of 2024(3) dt.28-10-2024 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sajour P.S. Case No. 01 of 2024, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner. (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Let the petitioner be released on bail on
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860; Arms Act, 1959 — s. 27.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.