✦ Patna High Court

MONIKA KEJRIWAL @ MONIKA DEVI KEJRIWAL v. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA & Ors.

Case at a glance

Judgment

premises by the respondent-Bank. The counsel for the respondent-Bank states that on 31.01.2007, principal plus the interest outstanding is about Rs 7,74,000/-. The petitioner undertakes to liquidate the same provided she is given some accommodation as the business has collapsed and they are fighting for survival. The learned counsel for the Bank has taken a very fair stand and stated that the Bank is not interested either in auctioning the property mortgaged or retaining its possession. It is only interested in recovery of its money. Considering the willingness on the part of the petitioner to pay the amount and willingness on part of the respondent-Bank to accept the amount as a pre-condition to release the premises, after hearing the parties and in interest of equity, the 2 following orders are being passed. The petitioner would deposit Rs 1.75 lacs within thirty days from today with the respondent-Bank and thereafter would deposit entire amount with accrued interest from 01.02.2007 to date within a period of six months of minimum Rs 1 lac per month installments. All payments have to be punctually made and failure to make payment of any one installment within the time stipulated would amount to automatic revocation of this indulgence granted by this Court and the respondent-Bank would be free to proceed to recover the amount in accordance with law. This disposes of the writ application. M.E.H./ (Navaniti Prasad Singh)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No. 5728 of 2008). ← Search more judgments